Tatiana Czekalska, Leszek Golec, the exhibition "The fifth activity," Art Museum in Lodz, 1996 (cat avatar and pin)
recently heard that some cite the authors are embarrassing . Strangely coinciding in time with reading my interview with Agnieszka Brzeżańska in which she confesses: texts on art I am no longer able to read, they weary me terribly, are collections of ribbons that do not generate any knowledge or information are usually sterile text ("Notes for 6 weeks ", No. 62, July-August 2010) . sighed with relief that I have a companion for distress, a sense of emptiness and sucking in the stomach with me very often when interacting with the texts on art. I read them less and less, because the little that is for me intellectual adventure, a Polish criticism is bland and dull, and for good measure extremely predictable. It is better to deal with literature, and - in my case even kryminałami.
Criticism produces neat and useless articles, descriptions of the most solemn - Polish critic omówieniami stands! - kind of ritual gesture: "I support this, and you're rooting for then." There is no discovery, no glamorous heroics, hardly what or who gives food for thought and discovering new lands. He quotes the same thing over and over again, reference is still the same name. If the controversy, according to court dance scheme or a testosterone infusion cocks, which shows that the struggle to being opinion leaders. I agree in this view, with James Banasiakiem, who had just said goodbye to the criticism. Burned out quickly, I must admit. I disagreed with his tendency to idle disputes and abuse of words, but I definitely agree: the need for more life, personal risk, more energy and emotion put into the criticism.
why I believe that rely on obscure authors, the risk that the author is not the intellectual top, it should provide a rather good than to be a source of criticism obciachu sense. Embarrassing - which is in general a criterion? Personals, outside considerations, negative, receiving the courage and ability to conduct research on their own. Who said that Polish art world are individualists? On the contrary: it is very a uniformity.
*
view on obciachu has been cited by Adam Mazur, when he discussed the work of Leszek Golec during a seminar at the Center of Polish Sculpture. Leszek Golec and cooperating with him Tatiana Czekalska are artists working in the margins of Polish artistic life. Marginalization in their case, thus means only that participate in it on her own terms, from time to time, consistently relying on its own worldview. Probably not they want the media popularity. Their activity, posture dramatically antyantropocentryczna, their views are of the order that their art is becoming increasingly tribune to promote the idea of \u200b\u200bvegetarianism, silent life, meditation, getting rid of aggression, a new spirituality.
If anything Thus artists are marginalized, it is their own choice. But not me see their situation in this way, repeatedly written about them, remember them today, actors active art scene - the organizers of exhibitions, etc. However, I understand that it is more about a certain helplessness criticism in the interpretation of this activity. Criticism of the art emergency and the manifest Zmijewski does not know what to do with Czekalska and heads. Criticism reinterprets them and does not invest in any location on the map of artistic events. They are somewhere on the side of a very exotic way of supplement.
Meanwhile, their activities can be recognized in the context of the new concept of spirituality, Steiner and Agamben to bow, not just the other day, Heidegger invoked by Mark Goździewskiego, relational aesthetics cries out for application. Well, and I had the audacity to call in the context of Golec and Czekalska - the name of Anthony De Mello. This is according to Adam's proof of my courage or bezrefleksyjności in the confrontation with the embarrassing. Intellectual probably. I'll wait until Adam publish the text and then can write a long controversy. But now I want to say that De Mello, a Jesuit, extremely well educated Indian, gained popularity in Poland in the 90s, as the author combines the tradition of the spirituality of the West and the East. His letters, written in more colloquial language and przystępniejsze than Thomas Merton, played a similar role to the writings of American Trapisty, such as Erich Fromm and DTSuzuki. Reasonable and adequate penetration is the intellectual background of the time when the data are discussed works of authors, and not ahistorical recourse fashionable in our time of authors (which after all did not deny the value). About Agambenie or relational aesthetics in Poland in the 90s not heard (the latter was founded after 2000). However, publications such as Empty Cloud, Santorski or profit, and the Company (and many others) seemed essential items from the canon of fascination with Eastern spiritual and philosophical systems. I do not think Agamben's writings współkształtowały Czekalska Golec and attitude. One is the background was important, even if not directly influenced by.
So, therefore, caution with this embarrassing - it could be a sign of ignorance.